The plight of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh has taken a critical turn as the World Food Program (WFP) announces significant reductions in food rations. This decision, effective April 1, will affect over one million individuals residing in Cox’s Bazar. The reduction from $12.50 to $6 per month raises concerns about nutrition and mental well-being among an already vulnerable population.

Addressing Urgent Needs: Ensuring Survival Amidst Aid Cuts

Humanitarian Crisis Deepens in Cox’s Bazar

The humanitarian crisis in Cox’s Bazar has deepened with the recent announcement of reduced food rations. Overcrowded camps now face an uncertain future as the WFP slashes monthly allocations by half. Shamsud Douza, the additional refugee relief and repatriation commissioner, highlighted the immediate impact on the community. “This reduction means less nutritious food, leading to potential health issues and social unrest,” he explained. The cutbacks extend beyond food, affecting various sectors and services that have been crucial for survival.The ripple effects are profound. Families like Manzur Ahmed’s, who depend entirely on aid, fear for their future. “We don’t have any income-generating opportunities here. How can we manage with just 700 taka ($6)?” he lamented. The situation is dire, with many questioning how they will meet basic needs such as rice, salt, sugar, and cooking oil.

Global Implications of U.S. Policy Shifts

The global implications of recent U.S. policy shifts cannot be overlooked. President Donald Trump’s executive order froze foreign aid funding for a 90-day review, significantly impacting the humanitarian sector. The dismantling of USAID has left a void in international assistance. Although it remains unclear if the WFP’s decision is directly linked to these actions, the timing suggests a correlation.Historically, the U.S. has been a leading donor, providing nearly half of the aid for Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. In 2024 alone, the country contributed around $300 million to emergency food and nutrition assistance. The abrupt halt in support has slowed down response efforts and led to job losses within the humanitarian workforce. “The reduction in available services does not bring a good result,” Douza noted, emphasizing the broader consequences.

Medical Services Under Strain

Medical services in the camps are also under strain. Dildar Begum, a 32-year-old mother, expressed her frustration with the declining quality of healthcare. “When we go to the hospital now, they only provide medicines for emergencies. Earlier, they would treat anyone who felt unwell,” she said. The shift in medical protocols reflects the broader challenges faced by the healthcare system amidst resource constraints.The situation is further complicated by the ongoing conflict in Myanmar. The Arakan Army has effectively taken control of Rakhine State, where many Rohingya were displaced. Thousands have crossed into Bangladesh seeking refuge. Despite this influx, the interim Bangladeshi government insists that Rohingya refugees must eventually return to Myanmar, a country accused of genocide against them in an international court.

Perspectives on Repatriation and Long-Term Solutions

Repatriation remains a contentious issue. While Bangladesh calls for the return of Rohingya refugees to Myanmar, the conditions in Myanmar make this unrealistic. The armed conflict and political instability pose significant risks. International pressure continues to mount for a sustainable solution that ensures the safety and rights of the Rohingya people.In the meantime, the focus must remain on addressing immediate needs. Humanitarian organizations and governments must collaborate to mitigate the adverse effects of aid cuts. Innovative solutions, including local partnerships and alternative funding sources, are essential to ensure the survival and dignity of those affected.